We find ourselves in the most notable text technological
moment since the invention of print, perhaps. That historical event took many
generations to be fully accepted, and even as it was generating trade,
enhancing the opportunities for increased and more democratized literacy, and
widening access to knowledge—particularly in the European vernaculars—it
functioned alongside manuscript culture, which itself had been the dominant
mode of textual creation for some five thousand years or more.
Now, some
571 years after Gutenberg and his Bible, manuscript culture is still absolutely
mainstream. Children write with pencils, students predominantly use pens and
notepaper, generally, we write notes, lists and cards by hand. The Digital has
not replaced the convenience of the manual, just as print did not replace it.
From that point of view, until printers are small enough to be carried around,
no computer, or IPhone or other device will completely replace pen and paper.
Moreover, until the Digital is absolutely independent of limited wireless and
is freely accessible with day-long battery life, no number of e-book readers
will replace the real book. And that’s just the practical side.
In relation
to the book itself, I’m going to think firstly about the debate surrounding the
demise of the book and independent bookshops. For the latter, the threat is not
primarily the e-book, it is Amazon and other vast mail-based sellers. An
intelligent and measured response is here: http://betweenthecoversblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/the-closing-of-the-american-bookstore/.
E-books are having an impact, certainly, but it is not universal. My
undergraduates, of whom there are 177, illustrate a set of varying responses
typical of their demographic: technological resistance, technological
inevitabilism, and technological embrace. Many of them--by far the
majority—claim to prefer not to engage with e-books, chiefly because of
aesthetic and intellectual reasons. Aesthetically, all of the students point to
the fact that ‘real’ book is infinitely superior to the electronic. Showing
high levels of self-reflective thinking, the students point out that they
cannot easily make notes and underlinings in e-book (such facilities do exist,
of course, but many do not utilize these packages); that they cannot read with
any degree of sustained concentration from the screen; that they enjoy the
untethered reliability of the book (which, as one student pointed out, ‘never
requires troubleshooting’); that they like to be able to turn the pages, hear
the spine crack (!!); feel the weight of the book; and, arguably most
interestingly, finish the book, gain a sense of achievement, watch their
library grow, and know that this is a tangible reflection of their increasing
academic prowess. Interestingly, many students regard the e-book as
‘ephemeral’, and this has proven to be the case in the past when Amazon has
removed books globally: literally taken them off a Kindle owner’s e-bookshelf (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html).
The
students who do use e-books do so because of issues of portability and
convenience, and generally associate this learning activity with university and
textbooks. A very small number of students has Kindle or Nook or an IPad; it
was something like a dozen out of the whole group. I assumed many other
studnets would be seeking to acquire such reading tools, but this is not the
case. This resistance stems from a feeling of overload—an overwhelming sense
that the pace of technology is so rapid, the appearance of new technology so
unrelenting that they might as well not bother. This is a proactive decision: a
willful response, not inertia or idleness. This generation may well feel such
scepticism and reluctance for decades, and may influence their children.
Younger readers, however, have a different set of responses, such as that of the
small toddler who cannot make a magazine interact like an IPod (http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/how-a-one-year-old-thinks-about-reading_b40042),
or the eleven-year old who spells in text-form as a first written language.
These children will become an intermediary generation in the next thirty years,
a generation that will dictate a new pace of change. Thus, layers of e-users
will have different responses to the speed and direction of technology, and
this is just in the Western world. Elsewhere, similarly variant reactions will
depend on localized factors, available resources, and individual preferences. From
my perspective, then, I don’t think we’ll see anything like the demise of the
book, or even an alteration in its form for hundreds of years, though I do
think there will be a shaking out of this technological transformation for
particular areas of publishing, and especially, academic publishing and
specialist, small print-run editions.
Where major
developments might be expected is in the area of electronic reading
experiences. The digital world has promised innovation and inventiveness for
some twenty or more years now. Yet from the academic perspective, no software
or interface has delivered anything deserving the label ‘innovative’ or ‘new’.
Packages that we saw in 1997—such as Martin Foys’ electronic edition of the
Bayeux Tapestry—seemed revolutionary and elicited gasps of amazement from the
audience at presentations. Now, such a package often cannot be made to function;
on my MacBookPro, its technology has proven unsustainable. Subsequent to this,
perhaps the most exciting technology is the Turn-the-Pages technology, used
first at the British Library, and now widely utilized by museums and software
developers. All that ever did was imitate the book, though, and never the
complete book—always an unstated abridged version. (And I apologise if I sound
like the typical grouchy user—the one without the talent to develop the
technology—because I do appreciate the amount of work and money it takes to
develop new software). Even so, until developers and designers can move away conceptually
from rather unimaginative attempts to emulate the real book, we can
expect little by way of excitement or even genuine competition for the codex.
This is the age of hybrid or residual technology; just as for many decades, the
printed book looked like a manuscript and used chirographic techniques to
include decoration and rubrication, so we are now in that intermediary period,
where the form of the codex dominates a technology that simply need not be bound
by the features of such a form.
No comments:
Post a Comment